Cancer Statistics. Cancer Disparities. Cancer Causes and Prevention. Risk Factors. Cancer Prevention Overview. Cancer Screening Overview. Screening Tests.
Diagnosis and Staging. Questions to Ask about Your Diagnosis. Types of Cancer Treatment. Side Effects of Cancer Treatment. Clinical Trials Information. A to Z List of Cancer Drugs. Questions to Ask about Your Treatment. Feelings and Cancer. Adjusting to Cancer.
Day-to-Day Life. Support for Caregivers. Questions to Ask About Cancer. Choices for Care. Talking about Your Advanced Cancer. Planning for Advanced Cancer. Advanced Cancer and Caregivers. Questions to Ask about Advanced Cancer. Managing Cancer Care. Finding Health Care Services. Advance Directives. Using Trusted Resources.
Coronavirus Information for Patients. Clinical Trials during Coronavirus. Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. Emotional Support for Young People with Cancer. Cancers by Body Location. Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Treatment.
Pediatric Supportive Care. Rare Cancers of Childhood Treatment. Childhood Cancer Genomics. These trends are driven by the trends in smoking. The other chart shows the sales of cigarettes per person. Smoking is the biggest risk factor for lung cancer and we see that the trends in lung cancer follow those in smoking with a lag of around 20 years. In 7 Million people globally died a premature death because of smoking.
The fact that smoking causes lung cancer is the major reason for the high death toll of smoking. It is possible to add the data to lung cancer in women in the US to this chart. In the US it was once much more common for men to smoke so that the peaks of lung cancer for men are much higher. Smoking became more common for women only later so that lung cancer death rates for women peaked later. The world map shows the Global Burden of Disease estimates of the share of cancer deaths that can be attributed to smoking.
In poor countries, where fewer people were smoking in the past, tobacco is responsible for a much smaller faction of cancer deaths. This charts provides a long run perspective on cancer death rates, from in the United States. Global cancer deaths are rising : in 5. To understand what is happening we therefore have to correct for the population increase and ask for the rate — the number of deaths per , people — and we have to adjust for ageing. When we compare these metrics shown here we see that age-standardized cancer death rates are falling globally.
Death rates which correct for ageing show a 17 percent decline from to Why are cancer death rates falling? One hypothesis is that cancer prevalence is falling i. Is this true? Globally, no. The share of people with cancer even when corrected for ageing has been slowly increasing in recent decades. Global cancer prevalence has risen from 0. In some countries — the US, for example — the age-corrected prevalence has been fairly constant in recent decades with the rate of new cases actually falling.
If death rates are falling but prevalence is rising or constant, then it must be the case that people with cancer have better or longer survival rates. We see this clearly in the USA when we look at the change in five-year survival rates across cancer types. This is shown in the chart as the change from to Here we see that on aggregate five-year survival rates for all cancers increased from But we also see significant differences not only in start or end survival rates, but the change over time.
Prostate cancer has close to 99 percent five-year survival, but has also seen major progress from a rate of 69 percent in the s.
In contrast, pancreas has low five-year survival rates at 8. Defining the exact attribution of each is difficult, and varies depending on cancer type. But there have been some studies which have attempted to do so. Scott Alexander published a very good overview of the relative impact of detection versus treatment here. One way to test whether survival rates only increased from early diagnosis is to look at how survival has changed for each stage of cancer: if detection was the only improvement then we would see no increase in survival rates in later cancer stages.
National cancer statistics published by the US government show increases in survival rate within all stages from very early to late-stage. Other studies focused on specific cancer types show similar results. Tumours have gotten smaller in recent decades — the result of earlier detection. Studies have shown that this can account for a significant share of survival improvements: one study attributed early detection as 61 percent and 28 percent of improved survival in localized-stage and regional-stage breast cancer, respectively 7 But even when correcting for size and early detection, we have seen improvements.
Progress here is important for many. Interactive chart: The same data shown in the chart can be viewed and downloaded in this interactive here. Cancer survival rates in the US by race can be seen here. In this charts, we provide the widest coverage across countries of five-year survival rates by cancer type.
This data was published in the The Lancet in by Allemani et al. The three maps below show how the five-year survival rates for lung, breast and liver cancer vary across the world. This data is again from Allemani et al. In breast cancer, higher income countries in particular across North America, Europe and Oceania tend to have five-year survival rates over 80 percent in This is almost double that of the lowest nation with available data in — Jordan — at only 43 percent.
Compared to breast cancer the five year survival rates for liver cancer are much lower around he world. The lowest survival rate in was in Romania with just 2. In these two charts we see that the five-year survival rates — following diagnosis — are lower in poorer countries.
Especially for breast cancer survival rates are lower in poorer countries. The relationship between lung cancer survival rate and average is less strong. There is significant variability in five-year survival rates between countries of a similar income, but the lowest survival rates are again reported from the poorest countries.
Are cancers caused by genetic factors, or determined by external factors such as behavioral, lifestyle and environmental exposure? The relative contribution of genetic factors DNA replication and tissue type versus external exposure has been a dominant topic within cancer research. The outcomes of such studies are highly important — if genetic factors are found to be dominant then early detection and understanding of the relative vulnerability of different DNA and tissue variations arguably present the best opportunity to reduce cancer burden.
In contrast, if external and environmental risk factors dominate, then lifestyle choice which reduces risk exposure is crucial for this reduction. This study therefore argued that, beyond some cancer types which are deterministic D-tumors and can be reduced through lifestyle factors or vaccines , the most promising approach to reduction of cancer deaths across most cancers replicative, R-tumors is early detection.
This paper has been highly contest within the scientific literature. A number of later publications in Science provided a rebuttal to these conclusions, suggesting analytical flaws in the prior analysis, and epidemiological evidence which suggests otherwise. Wu et al. The Global Burden of Disease GBD study attempt — using risk-exposure relationships — to provide attribution of certain risk factors to disease burden and mortality outcomes.
In the chart we see IHME estimates of the share of global cancer deaths which are attributed to one of these major risk factors. For example, 84 percent of tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer deaths are attributed to risk factors such as smoking and air pollution. The remaining share of deaths we would therefore assume no attribution to risk factors, and would occur naturally in the absence of such risks i.
Whilst cancer prevalence shows a positive relationship to income, death rates from cancer incorporate several factors: cancer prevalence, detection and treatment. When we compare cancer death rates across income we see no strong relationship between these measures. There is also no correlation between the level of income inequality in a country and the cancer death rate. These measures vary in the information they provide. This is an important metric for a number of reasons, including the need for management and provision of adequate health services which is dependent on the total societal burden, not just the incidence or risk for a given individual.
However, total number of cancer deaths fails to correct for population size and age. Cancer death rates correct for changes in population size , age-standardized death rates correct for population size and age structure. Age-standardization therefore gives a more indicative measure of the prevalence and incidence of underlying cancer risk factors between countries and with time without the influence of demographic and population structure changes. Summary Cancer is one of the leading causes of death.
As the world population is growing and aging the global number of cancer deaths is increasing. Adjusted for the increase and aging of the world population the rate of cancer deaths has declined slowly — the same is true for many countries. The world is making very slow progress. Lung cancer kills most people and smoking is largely to blame. These four account for more than four in ten of all cancers diagnosed worldwide. Worldwide there will be UK incidence is ranked higher than two-thirds of Europe.
Mortality worldwide. There were 9. Lung, liver, stomach, and bowel are the most common causes of cancer death worldwide, accounting for more than four in ten of all cancer deaths. Lung, liver, stomach and bowel cancers have been the four most common causes of cancer death since UK mortality is ranked lower than two-thirds of Europe. UK mortality is ranked higher than two-thirds of the world.
Risk factors worldwide. Cancer risk factors are overall similar worldwide. Smoking, insufficient physical activity, alcohol, diet, overweight and obesity, and infections account for a high proportion of cancers worldwide, as they do in the UK.
Prevalence of different risk factors varies by region and country, this is partly why overall cancer incidence rates, and the most common types of cancer, also vary by region and country. Worldwide, 1 billion adults currently smoke cigarettes. Smoking is the single most preventable cause of death in the world, and around a third of tobacco-caused deaths are due to cancer projected. Alcohol drinking prevalence is highest in Europe and America.
0コメント